Universal: Let's Stamp Out $1 Movie Rentals
The basic issue is that while consumers love renting movies from the kiosks for $1, Universal feels that, A, the kiosks threaten important partners like Blockbuster Video, and, B, don't cut Universal in on a share of the rental revenue. (They just purchase the DVD, and that's it.)
From Sarah McBride's story:
Blockbuster, which must rent and staff stores, might charge as much as $4.99 for the same rental. Last week, Blockbuster said it was testing renting some classic movies for 99 cents, because of factors such as the poor economy. It is also rolling out DVD kiosks of its own, starting with about 50 kiosks during the next few weeks at various retail locations such as convenience stores.
Big retailers such as Blockbuster typically give studios a portion of rental revenue on top of purchasing the DVDs they rent out. But Redbox doesn't cut the studios in on rentals.
...In addition, studios claim that stuffing DVDs in kiosks may cheapen the underlying product. "The studios have been worried about the Redbox model from day one," says Tom Adams, president of Adams Media Research. As a studio, "Why would I help you build a business that charges a dollar for a product I'm trying to sell for $20?"
So let's recap: New technologies that make movies more accessible and affordable to consumers... Hollywood still hates 'em.
Labels: Adams Media Research, Blockbuster, DVD, Redbox, Tom Adams, Universal
11 Comments:
Wait, I thought all movie rental businesses give the studios a cut on rentals. Isn't that part of the licensing agreement?
Does Netflix? If not, then why is Blockbuster singled out?
"consumers love renting movies from the kiosks for $1"
I'm confused, is Universal fighting the kiosks? or the price of $1 which is probably due to the fact that they're not getting a cut per rental?
By cycad, at 4:08 PM
lets look at it from an indie perspective. BB will buy between 8-15 thousand units at 5 bucks and own them with no rental agreement. If you're an indie producer that's still about 100K in sales, after manufacturing and sell thru costs.
On a rental agreement you will see about .30/rental and good luck trying to achieve those numbers with 50 copies of HELLBOY on the shelf.
Either way, we need to ensure that the consumer understands that a film costs more than an album and that the price of this form of entertainment needs to be more expensive if it is to continue.
By David Geertz, at 2:50 AM
if the studios don't like Redbox's business model, why do they sell them their products? stupid. and if blockbuster was smart they'd just buy Redbox.
By erikcantu, at 8:07 AM
Is thsi legal? I would have thought that a rental company would be required to cut in a percentage of the revenue. After all, when I buy a DVD, I'm not allowed to lend or rent out my DVDs without permission, why is Rebox?
By Dylan Pank, at 10:29 AM
I agree with Dylan Pank. Those DVD's I buy are only for HOME USE. I can't lend or rent it out. Isn't this a violation of copyright?
By Karl, at 11:00 AM
Guys, my understanding is that if you're buying wholesale DVDs from a distributor, the law allows you to rent those out for whatever price you choose. Certain retailers may opt to do revenue-sharing with studios for the guarantee of a lower purchase price, or access to large numbers of DVDs of a hit movie.
But if everyone was required to do revenue-sharing (essentially getting the studio's permission to do rentals), we likely wouldn't have seen growth of the videotape or DVD rental business at all...
You can read a bit about revenue-sharing here:
http://www.netflix.com/MediaCenter?id=1027
http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=258
http://books.google.com/books?id=v67U9jyHyR8C&pg=PA339&lpg=PA339&dq=revenue-sharing+video+cassettes&source=web&ots=MFRlwE3ScP&sig=p8v7wRKCeUdNkLmgNGeul7bljz8&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=4&ct=result
By Scott Kirsner, at 11:10 AM
Hey Scott,
What is your opinion of this type of rental? Is it a good thing that movies are being rented for $1? Is RedBox profitable with their kiosks?
This seems to continue what I consider to be a rather dire trend for the independent film world as a whole. As David points out, consumers continue to get reinforcement that movies have virtually no value/cost associated with them (and this is for studio films). Online streaming revenue scenarios are similarly bad in all regards to what flows back to content producers - except in the cases of one-man-shop low-end fare.
I can't believe I'm about to type this, but in this instance - I think I agree with Universal. What if RedBox ultimately fails, but it drives consumer price perception lower? In the process it could further erode valuable revenue sources like Blockbuster or drive them out of business completely.
By Steve, at 2:58 AM
I'm pro-Redbox, Steve.
I don't think they care at all about indie films - only new releases - so this doesn't really affect the indie film world (or it does, but very tangentially.)
Netflix succeeded by making it cheaper to rent DVDs - or at least giving us the perception that its cheaper, by eliminating late fees. They grew a big business by getting rid of that punishing $20 late fee that we all have paid to Blockbuster once or twice.
I do like the kiosks, because they make it convenient and cheap for a certain kind of person (harried shopper, most likely a mom) to rent a certain kind of movie.
Also - just noticed that Amazon is doing 99 cent digital rentals on some of its titles. Is that a bad thing?
;)
By Scott Kirsner, at 9:02 AM
iTunes has a few weekly 99 cent rentals also. When I was growing up, nearly all of the mom and pop video stores had some sort of $1 movie rental special ($1 Tuesdays, or 5 for 5 days for $5).
By Sean Fitzroy, at 1:23 PM
網頁設計,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品
色情遊戲,寄情築園小遊戲,情色文學,一葉情貼圖片區,情惑用品性易購,情人視訊網,辣妹視訊,情色交友,成人論壇,情色論壇,愛情公寓,情色,舊情人,情色貼圖,色情聊天室,色情小說,做愛,做愛影片,性愛
免費視訊聊天室,aio交友愛情館,愛情公寓,一葉情貼圖片區,情色貼圖,情色文學,色情聊天室,情色小說,情色電影,情色論壇,成人論壇,辣妹視訊,視訊聊天室,情色視訊,免費視訊,免費視訊聊天,視訊交友網,視訊聊天室,視訊美女,視訊交友,視訊交友90739,UT聊天室,聊天室,豆豆聊天室,尋夢園聊天室,聊天室尋夢園,080聊天室,080苗栗人聊天室,女同志聊天室,上班族聊天室,小高聊天室
AV,AV女優
視訊,影音視訊聊天室,視訊交友
視訊,影音視訊聊天室,視訊聊天室
By Anonymous, at 9:32 AM
禹承妍照片吳淑敏寫真n95型口罩 藤原紀香尹雪姬販毒溫昇豪部落格 賈靜雯部落格禹承妍自殺電玩少女瑤瑤開球 吳威廷blog時尚服飾,服裝搭配 祕魯議員萊昂 最新發型 豬哥亮廣告哈拉论坛汽车租赁
By Anonymous, at 9:43 AM
Post a Comment
<< Home